Back to the Self-Defence Line (diary entry)
- jamie03066
- Jun 15, 2015
- 2 min read
12.05.13
This client was keen to return his training back to basics after our last session’s complete detour into cross-training. The above diagram demonstrates my approach to learning cross-training attributes to improve self-defence. Despite a long lay-off between sessions and even longer one between self-defence specific training the student confirmed that the low maintenance nature of the techniques taught. After a short warm-up we went straight onto the focus mitts for some fence revision. Transitioning from postures for both straight and hooked strikes was also confirmed, as was pre-emptive striking multiple aggressors. This was followed by the cover counter-attack performed as a “code white test” (begins with the eyes closed) from all angles and included offline striking. I was happy to see that my client used whatever range weapon was available with the offline strike responses. These included elbow, back open hand and back hammer-fist. The tool was secondary to the way he used his body to generate the response and the lack of delay exhibited when responding.
We revised aspects of anti-grappling, including digit-breaking, eye-gouges, head-butts and biting. This followed by asymmetrical and symmetrical ground-fighting. Multiple aggressor response was covered from the asymmetrical situation. We also covered lowline strikes and variations from different angles and ranges.
New material came in the form of takedown training. Building on from simplistic highline attacks, we looked at the major outer-reaping throw, the neck-ring and a waistlock takedown. In the first instance we covered variations on this technique, including attacking the nose and throat.
My client is a graduate of philosophy, so it is always very interesting to discuss certain theoretical principles with him. Today he pointed out a philosophical argument regarding academic information versus experience. Popularly known as Frank Jackson’s “Knowledge Argument” and sometimes as “Mary's Room”, it is an interesting concept and argues that even though an individual may told every piece of information about a subject possible, they will gain something new by physically experiencing it. I base my coaching on beginning with a physical experience and then working my way back from it in order to refine the techniques used.
Comments