Martial Arts Cross-Training: Lesson Nine Building Balance and Kicking Flow at 66
- Jamie Clubb

- 11 minutes ago
- 9 min read

Martial Arts Cross-Training
Getting up from the floor without using the hands is a simple test. It is also a revealing one.
Lesson nine with my 66-year-old client returned to this problem. We used it to build balance, co-ordination and useful strength. We also linked the same ideas back into his Taekwondo kicking.
This client suffered a head injury years ago. He later took up Taekwondo to help improve his condition. He came to me for wider conditioning. I have trained in Korean martial arts for decades, but this booking has been a clear reminder of the value of looking outside one system.
He has already passed his yellow belt at his Taekwondo club since starting these private lessons. That is a good marker of progress. Now he wants to sharpen his directional kicking. At the same time, we continue to work on balance at a very basic level.
Basic does not mean easy. It means important.
Getting up from the floor is a balance exercise
Many people think balance training means standing on one leg. That has its place. It is not enough.
Balance involves the whole body. The feet matter. So do the hips, trunk, neck, shoulders and eyes. The floor also matters. If someone struggles to organise himself on the ground, that will show up when he tries to stand, turn, kick or recover from a missed technique.
Getting up from the floor without the hands gives us several useful things at once.
It asks for:
Trunk strength
Hip mobility
Leg drive
Spatial awareness
Calm breathing
Co-ordination under mild pressure
It also gives immediate feedback. The body either finds a route or it does not. There is little room for self-deception.
This is why I like these movements for older martial artists. They are honest. They can be scaled. They connect exercise to function.
This lesson was not about turning ground movement into a circus act. It was about giving him practical options. In senior martial arts, that should always be the priority. The training must support the person in front of you. It must not flatter the instructor’s favourite methods.
The aim was clear. He needs to get from his back to standing without relying on his hands.
We broke the rise into four clear postures
The full movement we are building has four postures.
Back
Seated
Half-kneeling
Standing
That gives us three transitions to train.
Back to seated
Seated to half-kneeling
Half-kneeling to standing
Breaking the task down matters. If the full movement fails, we need to know where it breaks. Guessing wastes time. A clear structure lets us target the weak link.
Today we confirmed two parts.
He could roll from his back to the seated position. He could also rise from half-kneeling to standing. These were not one-off moments. We repeated them. Repetition shows whether the movement is available or accidental.
The back-to-seated movement asked him to turn, fold and organise his legs without reaching for the floor with his hands. This can be awkward at first. The body often wants to push with the hands because that is the habit. Removing the hands forces the trunk and hips to do more work.
The half-kneeling-to-standing movement gave us another clear test. From half-kneeling, he had to drive through the legs, bring his weight over his base and stand without tipping or reaching. This is a daily-life movement as much as a martial arts movement. It appears when someone rises from the floor, gets up from gardening or recovers after stumbling.
We worked both sides. That is essential.
One side often feels more natural. Most people have a preferred direction for turning, stepping and rising. Martial arts can hide this if training always begins from the same stance or feeds the same leg. The floor exposes it quickly.
He attempted the full sequence from both sides. The current sticking point is the seated-to-half-kneeling section.
That is the goal for upcoming practice.
The missing link is seated to half-kneeling
The seated-to-half-kneeling transition is harder than it looks.
From seated, the student must move the legs into a useful position, shift weight, bring one knee underneath and rise without using the hands. The hips have to open and close. The trunk has to support the shift. The head and chest must avoid collapsing away from the direction of travel.
That is a lot of information for the body to process.
When we isolate a difficult section, we reduce the noise. We do not keep forcing the full sequence and hope for the best. We work the missing link.
This is where short, frequent practice helps. These exercises do not need long sessions. They need regular contact.
A useful home practice might be:
Three to five good rolls from back to seated on each side
Three to five rises from half-kneeling to standing on each side
A few careful attempts to connect seated to half-kneeling
Plenty of rest between attempts
Quality matters more than numbers.
Fatigue changes movement. Once the student is tired, he will revert to old habits. That may mean pushing with the hands, twisting too sharply or rushing the rise. The nervous system learns what it repeats. Poor repetitions still count.
The point is to make the movement smoother and safer, not to grind through it.
This training also carries a combative function. Every posture in the sequence has value. Being on the back, sitting up, half-kneeling and standing all appear in fighting contexts. None of them should be strange positions.
A good martial artist should know how to move through these levels. He should also know what each level offers and what dangers it brings.
On the back, the priority is organisation and protection. In seated posture, the priority becomes creating space and preparing to rise or engage. In half-kneeling, the person is nearly upright but still vulnerable. Standing returns mobility, but only if balance is present.
The exercise may look like general movement training. It is also martial arts.
We also practised getting up by any route available
I also gave him a simple instruction. Get off the ground any way you can, but do not use the hands.
This matters because real movement is untidy. A formal exercise teaches a clean route. An open task shows what the student does when left to solve the problem.
He used his elbows.
That is fine for this stage. It tells me where he currently places his trust. The hands were removed, so the elbows became the next support. We can work with that.
The next progression will be to reduce the support.
First, he can use one elbow. After that, both shoulders. Then one shoulder. Each step asks more from the trunk, hips and legs. Each step also builds confidence in the body’s ability to move without always bracing through the arms.
This progression is simple.
Hands removed
Elbows allowed
One elbow allowed
Shoulders allowed
One shoulder allowed
No upper-limb support
The language must stay plain. There is no need to dress this up. He is learning to recruit the whole body in a purposeful way.
That word, purposeful, matters.
A lot of exercise becomes disconnected from life. Muscles are trained in small parts. Machines or fixed patterns can keep balance out of the equation. They may have their uses, but they do not always teach a person how to move as one piece.
Getting up from the floor solves that problem. The body has to co-operate. The legs cannot do their job if the trunk gives way. The hips cannot move well if the student panics and grabs for support. The head cannot drift away from the base without affecting balance.
The NHS advises older adults to include activities that improve strength and balance as part of weekly physical activity. Martial arts training can fit that purpose when it is taught with care. It must be scaled to the individual. It must respect injury history. It must not promise medical outcomes.
This lesson fitted that approach. It was physical work with a clear function.
Directional kicking needed isolation and flow
After the ground movement, we moved to kicking.
His current interest is directional kicking. This makes sense. Taekwondo asks students to kick in set directions while maintaining posture, foot position and control. For a newer student, especially an older one, this can become messy when the body turns faster than balance can follow.
We isolated the front kick and the side kick.
Isolation lets the student feel what each kick demands.
The front kick travels forward. It asks the knee to lift, the lower leg to extend and the foot to return under control. The supporting leg must stay active. The upper body must avoid leaning too far back.
The side kick has a different shape. It asks for a chambered leg, a turn of the hip and a clear line through the heel or blade of the foot, depending on the version being taught. It also asks more from the supporting side because the body must manage a sideways line of force.
We worked both kicks as separate actions first.
Then we linked them.
The task was to move between front kick and side kick without putting the kicking foot down. This is a valuable drill. It exposes balance errors at once. If the student drops the foot, rushes, leans or loses the chamber, the transition tells the truth.
This kind of drill also teaches control between techniques. Many students focus on the moment of impact. They forget the spaces before and after. In kicking, those spaces decide whether a person can recover, change direction or defend.
A kick is not finished when the leg extends. It is finished when the body has regained useful balance.
That was the theme of this lesson.
Physical aids made the kicking clearer
I used the wall as a physical aid. I also used targets.
Both helped.
The wall gave him a reference point. It allowed him to reduce the fear of falling while he explored the kicking line. This is not cheating. It is sensible teaching. The aid lets the student feel the movement without being overwhelmed by balance demands.
Then the aid can be reduced.
Targets gave him a clear direction. This also matters. Without a target, a kick can become vague. The leg lifts and extends, but the student has no precise job. A target gives the kick a destination.
He found both aids helpful.
That is the point of good coaching. Find the level where the student can succeed, then make the task slightly harder. Do not pretend that struggling equals learning. It can, but only when the struggle has structure.
For this client, the wall gave safety and feedback. The target gave purpose. Together, they allowed him to connect balance with intent.
The front kick and side kick became less like static shapes. They became actions that could change direction.
That is what he needs for his Taekwondo.
What lesson nine showed
This was not a dramatic lesson. It did not need to be.
The valuable work often looks plain. Roll up. Sit. Rise. Stand. Lift the knee. Kick forward. Turn the hip. Kick sideways. Keep the foot off the floor. Try again.
The progress sits inside those details.
We confirmed the following:
He can roll from his back to seated.
He can rise from half-kneeling to standing.
He can attempt the full sequence on both sides.
The seated-to-half-kneeling transition now needs focused work.
He can use elbow support to get up without using his hands.
The next step is reducing that support.
He responds well to walls and targets during kicking practice.
His front kick to side kick transition can be trained without dropping the foot.
This is exactly why martial arts cross-training has value. It does not replace his Taekwondo. It supports it. It gives him movement tools that feed back into his main art.
The best result is not a trick. The best result is a student who moves with more confidence, more options and better balance.
For anyone interested in this type of individual training near Chipping Norton, you can read more about my approach to martial arts fitness and private training.
FAQ
Can older adults start martial arts if they have balance concerns?
Yes, if the training is adapted and the instructor understands the person’s limits. Balance work should begin with simple tasks and clear support. Anyone with a medical history should also follow advice from a qualified health professional.
Why practise getting up without using the hands?
It develops leg strength, trunk control and balance. It also reduces over-reliance on pushing through the hands. The movement has practical value in daily life and martial arts.
Is using a wall during kicking bad practice?
No. A wall can help a student learn the line of a kick without fear taking over. The aim is to use the wall as a temporary aid, then reduce reliance on it.
Why train front kick and side kick together?
The transition teaches control. It also helps the student change direction without losing balance. This is useful in Taekwondo patterns, pad work and general movement.
How often should these floor exercises be practised?
Short and regular practice works best. A few careful repetitions at home can help, provided the surface is safe and the student does not rush. Quality matters more than volume.
The lesson ended where it needed to end. We had clear evidence of progress and an obvious target for the next session. Seated to half-kneeling is the bridge. Once that bridge is stronger, the full rise from back to standing will become a realistic movement rather than a forced effort.




Comments